This report is the result of a research combining desk researches, analysis and semi-structured interviews of experts working with children suspected or accused of having committed a criminal offence involved in judicial proceedings. We have interviewed and talked with lawyers, social workers, members of the Commission for Combating Juvenile Delinquency (“the Comission”), police officers, judges, prosecutors, teachers, university professors and children.

The present report aims at identifying the challenges and obstacles for the use of diversion, and mapping the existing alternatives measures to the traditional judicial systems for children in rural areas.

Juvenile justice system in Bulgaria has developed during the past 25 years. In 1991 Bulgaria ratified the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC). The same year the new Bulgarian Constitution was adopted. During the following years Bulgaria ratified several international human rights treaties. In 2000 the Child Protection Act was adopted. In 2007 the country became a member of the European Union.

Despite the important development and achievements in children’s rights and child protection concepts, Bulgarian juvenile justice system remained deeply bounded to the perceptions concerning juvenile delinquents and “fighting” with their anti-social behaviour.

At present in Bulgaria there are two laws that operate simultaneously – Child Protection Law, adopted in 2000, which is focused on the protection of the normal physical, mental, moral and social development of the child and the Fighting against Anti-Social Behavior of Minors and Underage Persons Act (FASBMUPA), adopted in 1958, which regulates the activities for prevention and counteraction to anti-social behavior of under-aged and minors. Since the changes in 1989 the FASBMUPA, which is amended more than 25 times, had two significant reforms: in 1996, the Labor Educational Schools have been renamed in Correctional Boarding Schools (CBS) and judicial review was introduced of the decisions for placement in them, and in 2004, when was included the court to decide on placement of the children in CBS and Socio-Pedagogical Boarding Schools (SPBS). In Bulgarian legislation there is no definition of the term anti-social behavior. The Local Commissions have a margin of appreciation to decide which act can be considered as anti-social behavior. As it can be seen in the statistics of the National Statistics Institute anti-social behavior is: running away from home, wandering, drinking, drug use, prostitution, homosexuality, truancy, begging and others.

Despite that the minimum age of criminal responsibility, stipulated in the Bulgarian Criminal Code, is 14 and no child under this age should be subject to criminal charges, all measures under FASBMUPA, including placement in closed institutions, are imposed on children between 8-18 years old.

Child Protection Law and FASBMUPA are pursuing different aims: the first guarantees the children’s rights and their protection by the institutions and the second is focused on the combat of anti-social behavior  of children and the maintenance of public order. Presently both systems are working in parallel and it is difficult to establish examples of coordination between them. The procedure under FASBMUPA focuses on punishment, prosecution and on detention rather than on protection, rehabilitation, diversion, restorative justice and alternatives in community. The children involved in the procedures under FASBMUPA do not participate in them voluntarily and the measures are imposed unilaterally by the Commission or the court.

In Bulgaria there is not specialized and separate justice system for children. The statistics discloses that the biggest number of children in conflict with the law are accused of petty or non-violent offences or even acts, which if committed by adults will not be considered as an offence.

Attachment Size
Bulgarian national report in English360.43 KB 360.43 KB
Bulgarian National Report in Bulgarian188.48 KB 188.48 KB
Publication type
Total pages
32
Countries this relates to

Childhub

You might like..

yes
0
512
The following e-learning course is created to support child protection professionals channel juvenile offenders away from judicial proceedings by giving an overview on alternative methods and tools. In this course, we will discuss why …
0
40
The following e-learning course is created to support child protection professionals channel juvenile offenders away from judicial proceedings by giving an overview on alternative methods and tools. In this course, we will discuss why …
yes
0
249
Juvenile justice systems in Europe have undergone considerable change over the past 20 years, particularly those in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE). These legal and structural changes concerned the implementation of alternative measures, diversion…
yes
0
30
The webinar is designed for professionals working with children in conflict with the law. The webinar is organized by Program for the Development of the Judicial System Association and  Know-how centre for alternative care for…
0
42
The 'Alternative Ways Addressing Youth" is a project co-funded by the European Union, which runs in five countries, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Hungary and Romania, and it promotes alternatives to custodial measures for children and young people in…
0
376
This Paper, carried out by Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) in partnership with Microsoft, introduces the key findings of a quantitative study of youth-produced sexual content online.The Study took place over a three month period between…
0
50
An updated country report for Greece produced by the Greek Council for Refugees (GCR) Legal Unit in cooperation with European Council for Refugees and Exiles, is part of AIDA (Asylum Information Database), aiming to provide up-to date…
0
13
  WebFactor: Assessment of the Legal Framework and Institutional Readiness to address Child Sexual Exploitation and Abuse online in Albania” is a comprehensive national assessment commissioned by UNICEF Albania which aims to provide deep…
yes
0
37
Executive Summary:   The National Report describes existing standards, regulations, indicators and systems for monitoring the quality of child protection services in Bulgaria. It reviews the mechanisms and procedures applied by national…
0
55
The Bulgarian National Television news report on SOS Children's Villages’ ‘Firefly - Illuminate the Darkness’ Project draws attention to how foster parents, social workers, psychologists and specialists working with children are trained to protect…
no
0
65
ALBANIA: Tier 2 The Government of Albania does not fully meet the minimum standards for the elimination of trafficking but is making significant efforts to do so. The government demonstrated overall increasing efforts compared to the previous…
0
16
The present practice of border management in Hungary raises concerns regarding refugees’ access to protection. Migrants’ testimonies and anecdotal evidence shows that Hungarian authorities escort potential asylum seekers, including migrant families…
0
1
This Alternative Report has been developed by the Nobody’s Children Foundation and the Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights, and in cooperation with more other NGOs playing active role in the field of the protection of child rights. In the document…
0
5
On 10-11 May 2016 in Vienna, Austria, the Child Protection Hub for South East Europe organised a Regional Policy Forum on Decentralisation of Social Services. This event brought together over 60 participants, including policy makers, local…
0
75
KOSOVO: Tier 2 The Government of Kosovo does not fully meet the minimum standards for the elimination of trafficking but is making significant efforts to do so. The government demonstrated overall increasing efforts compared to the previous…